Comments on: Dr. Manhattan's Wang Signs Development Deal With LOGO

By: BlueVeiner

BlueVeiner — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:21:14 +0000

To kayla, the actor’s name is Billy Crudup.

Anyway, what I wanted to say is: Dr. Manhattan really is super-human. I was impressed with his ability to take that tremendous blue-veiner to the arctic and not have it turn into an acorn.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:03:24 +0000

I actually thought this was going to have something to do with LOGO. And now I’m embarrassed.

By: Destroyer

Destroyer — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:05:11 +0000

What are these women talking about, saying it’s about time a man’s penis was shown in a movie? Crying Game: penis. Boogie Nights: penis. The Hangover: penis. Bad Lieutenant: penis. Strange Wilderness: penis. There has been more than enough penis for you to see in mainstream films, and for a long time. When do we get see a woman’s coochie? Never. I don’t mean some “frontal” bush in an 80’s horror’s movie — that’s nothing. I’m talking about the vagina between a woman’s legs. I don’t see how Hollywood decided it’s ok to parade all these dongs in movies, but never show any labia once. Doesn’t have to be a sexual scene, so why is it never even shown in a natural course of on-screen events or as some sort of comic relief as a lot these penis scenes are? Not once, so don’t even talk about a double standard. Then again I didn’t see the Hannah Montana movie yet.

By: Atom

Atom — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:28:21 +0000

It says a lot about the world we live in, when the ‘villian’ is a hero who kills million of people to save the world…and ALL people can talk about is Manhattans dick.
Pathetic, but not too shocking.

By: kayla

kayla — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:48:21 +0000

who is the guy in the pic at the top? his face kinda scares me but hes got a smokin hot bod! anyone know?

By: Deltus

Deltus — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:27:09 +0000

Here’s what funny about the big blue CGI penis: there was a CGI animator that was assigned to the penis. They might have had other CGI tasks to do, but the penis was theirs. They had to be sure they got the math right for how the penis would wobble and sway back and forth when Dr. Manhattan walked. And at some point, they were coding it, and they and the CGI supervisor were looking at a computer screen watching samples of big blue wangs swaying back and forth.

And it was at THAT moment that the full realization hit the CGI artist of what they were doing. And they said to themselves, “Yeah, THIS is what I went to CGI school for. Fuck… I need a drink.”

That’s funny, right there.

By: Geekoid

Geekoid — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:00:42 +0000

I know what I’m going to be for Halloween. Dr. Manhattans penis.

By: Brooke

Brooke — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:07:01 +0000

It’s just funny that it’s always assumed the nude human body is shown for the amusement of men. If it’s nude males, then it’s “homoerotic.” If it’s females then it must be aimed at straight males.

As a visually-stimulated bisexual woman, I find that silly. The actor/CGI portraying Dr. was not in the least bit sexy, therefore the blue cock did nothing for me. However, give Christian Bale or Johnny Depp a full frontal, and you have my attention

By: hhmm

hhmm — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:20:12 +0000

I have to agree with Crystal Lynn…I’m an art student, so I’m use to seeing the nude male, but I feel it is due time that the male form is shown in film, as long as it makes sense to show it and is not done in raunchy ways. I’m tired of the female body being shown often, and always as a sexual object. Watchmen is guilty of doing this, as we only see the female nude in sex scenes…many of them…the media distorts our perception of reality so much, I’m scared for America’s next generation (but that’s another conversation!).
On a more positive note, the special effects were amazing!!! Best I’ve seen in years!

By: Alan

Alan — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:33:03 +0000

Funny, I thought it looked small.